notion of an electronic signature system was pretty requirements for each state. “We couldn’t just single
scary,” says Tom Gonser, founder and VP of product out certain states where it could be available, so we
strategy for DocuSign. “It was digital certifications really did have to make it available in all 50 states,”
and installing software. It was not pleasant.” In con- says Paul Mineck, VP of administration for the Duluth,
trast, he notes that with DocuSign’s technology Ga.-based insurer.
and a browser, an insurer can send a con- Though entrenched in an “old-school
tract and have it signed online. business, kneecap to kneecap, where paper
The use of highly secure authentication and flip charts are used,” WFG imple-
such as biometrics and digital certifica- mented e-signature technology from
tions never took off for customer-facing CIC, a year ago in order to make it easier
type applications because of their for agents to do business with their
excessive complexity and cost for clients, to enhance the relationship
deployment in those situations, notes between its agents and product
Michael Laurie,VP of product strate- providers and to better attract and
gy and a co-founder of Silanis. retain life insurance associates,
Insurers might be held back by Mineck says. The firm’s U.S. rollout
other reasons. While some may start or has gone so well that it now is looking at
continue e-signature projects during introducing the technology to its
Paul Mineck
a recession to reap cost savings— Canadian associates as well.
World Financial Group
especially if it is part of a larger STP Still, carriers may find resistance
project—others may stall plans since they’re from customers, at least at first, to e-signa-too strapped for capital. A majority of insur- ture technology, for some lack comput-ance companies (62%) were not using ers or simply want to receive policies via
any form of e-signatures in their deal- regular mail.
ings with customers or agents, “If you ask the average person on
according to a December 2007 the street to sign something electron-study by Craig Weber, SVP, of ically, if they haven’t used it before, it
Celent, a Boston.-based financial sounds odd,” Amica Life’s Hannah
research and consulting firm. Since says. “People are reluctant to commit
that time “we have moved the football to something they don’t really under-forward, but we probably are not stand.” Consequently, Amica Life
into first-down territory,” says Hector Maury trains its sales agents to walk their
MassMutual
Weber, adding that the market cri- customers as simply as possible
sis likely has thwarted insurers from under- through the process so that e-signatures seem
taking non-essential major projects, such “like the most natural thing in the world,”
as e-signatures. Furthermore, some life Hannah says, noting that the sales indi-
insurers lack electronic applications, so viduals who have done so have experi-
have no need for e-signatures. “And enced a very high rate of usage.
creating an e-app is a pretty big Keen on boosting its adoption
undertaking,” he says. rates, Liberty Mutual plans to assess
World Financial Group Inc. precisely why some people are
(WFG) talked about implementing e- resistant to e-signatures. And it is
signatures for a long time, but balked in cautious not to force-feed e-signatures
part because life insurance submis- so that it does not disrupt the sales
sions via the Internet are complicat- Gary DeGruttola process or create a bad customer
ed due to the 50 different filing experience. “We don’t want to
Liberty Mutual
give customers a reason to leave us, so we are not
going to force our agents to push it,” says
DeGruttola. “We’ll offer it to the customer and
explain the benefits, and if they adopt it, great; if
they don’t, that’s okay too.” Older agents of insurance companies, in particular, can be inclined to
carry around paper, pens and forms; their displacement by new, younger “digital natives” will help
insurers create a true e-app environment, says
Gartner’s Leigh.
Diversifying Offerings
Concerned about adoption, MassMutual is considering using different types of technology. It will begin
with a Click2Sign implementation (See “e-Signature
Example: ‘Click2Sign,’” page 14), and at the request
of its agents, it will consider providing signature pad
technology for its financial services professionals.
Some vendors have recognized the importance of
diversity by being able to provide solutions that can
accommodate different means of input.
Indeed, analysts such as Leigh of Gartner urge
insurers to give customers their preference of one or
more mediums (phone, Internet and paper) to execute transactions. That is, one client might want to
contact the carrier by phone and obtain a policy
online via an e-signature. Another, however, might
call the carrier to ask to change the beneficiary on
its policy and might want to continue with a phone
transaction.
Instead of saying, “Go to the Web site to do it,” a
progressive carrier will be able to say, “Speak your
name and do a voice print signature over the
phone.”
Like Click2Sign technology, voice signatures are a
low-tech but highly effective method, according to
Weber of Celent. “It is very easy in a call center environment to record the call and memorialize the
assent” of the policyholder, he says. INN
Daniel Joelson is a freelance business writer based
in Alexandria,Va.
For more about e-signatures,
search "Do E-Signature Benefits
Outweigh the Risks?" at
www.insurancenetworking.com.