BACKOFFICE
Strategies and technologies to boost
behind-the scenes efficiencies
need to better understand how these
seemingly disparate risks interact. In
order to maintain proper capital requirements, he says, carriers will have
to project stochastically for a broader
range of economic conditions. “
Thirty years ago it was mainly mortality
risk for life insurers, but now the
products being sold are asset accumulation products, so life insurers are
now much more exposed to the capital market risk.”
Risk and Opportunity
Donna Kinnaird
Swiss Re & Health America
losses recognized throughout industry
investment portfolios.
Another under-appreciated risk
specific to life insurers was the complexity engendered by living benefits
guarantees contained in many variable annuities. Some insurers poorly
designed these contracts with insufficient hedges, so when the stock
market tanked, policyholders selected
against them and put them in a tough
spot. Even now as the stock markets
recover, insurers need to account for
the impact a prolonged low interest
rate environment will have on bond
yields. “If we go through five or six
years of potentially low interest rates,
what does that do to portfolio rates?”
asks Greg Smith, VP Insurance Research and Consulting, for Hartford,
Conn.-based Conning Research &
Consulting.
Bennett says the crisis drove home
the widening breadth of financial risk
for life insurers and underscored the
THE WILDCARD
In addition to a better understanding of
these capital-market incurred risks, life
insurers are also looking to better account for their traditional antagonistic
risks—mortality and longevity. While
the risk of a short spike in mortality
claims presents near-term risk to life insurers, the corollary of populations with
increasing life expectancies also presents risk management challenges. Traditionally, insurers could hedge one
against the other, because the 40-year
old making premium payments on a
life insurance policy was not likely to be
receiving annuity benefits. However,
this balance has become an increasingly
difficult one to achieve. An insurer overestimating longevity risk may hold too
much capital in reserve, instead of employing it to better effect elsewhere in
the business. Underestimation brings
its own set of problems.
A recent report from Zurich-based
Swiss Re, “A Short Guide to Longer
Lives: Longevity Funding Issues and
Potential Solutions,” notes that underestimating life expectancy by just one
With life expectancy increasing, life insurers, pension plans and
governments are confronting a growing longevity problem. individuals are also incur-
ring greater longevity risk as they outlive their savings. “you are seeing longevity risk
being transferred back over to the individual and it’s a pretty sophisticated risk for
individuals to handle on their own,” says donna Kinnaird, president of swiss re life &
health america.
thus, the longevity problem also presents an opportunity. reinsurers are well po-
sitioned to help mitigate longevity risk, Kinnaird says. “We are going to have to find a
way to help people handle this exposure.”
however, one concern is finite capacity in the reinsurance market as swiss re esti-
mates that globally more than $17 trillion worth of pension assets are exposed to
longevity risk. “We’ll eventually get to the point where there’s just too much risk for
reinsurers to be of assistance,” she says.
accordingly, Kinnaird says cooperation between governments, employers and the
financial services industry will be needed in order to create the mechanisms to share
this risk with the broader capital markets. to this point, a group of insurers, reinsurers
and banks have set up the life and longevity Market association to promote a dedi-
cated capital market for longevity and mortality-related risk.
year can increase liabilities for insurers or pension plans by up to 5%.
“One thing that is the wildcard is systemic longevity risk,” says Donna Kinnaird, President of Swiss Re Life &
Health America.
Since a universal base table for life
expectancy does not exist today, life
insurers will need to develop internal
models to get a better grasp on life
expectancy.
“Our ability to model the risk is
certainly improving,” Kinnaird says.
“Reinsurers and actuarial societies
that have access to large amounts of
data are doing the things we need to
do to model longevity risk.”
Conning’s Smith also perceives
modeling techniques advancing. “The
state of practice for modeling has im-
proved quite a bit,” he says. “The
models are well aligned to blocks of
business that people are projecting
with them.”
Andrew Coburn, VP for the Emerg-
ing Risk Solutions business unit of
Newark, Calif.-based Risk Management
Solutions Inc., says life insurers are be-
ginning to catch up to property/casu-
alty (P&C) and reinsurers in blending a
number of scientific and engineering
disciplines together with actuarial sci-
ence. Much as catastrophe modelers
have incorporated the research of me-
“What we’re seeing post crisis is some vindication that life
insurers are really doing a much better job managing risk
than was previously acknowledged.”
— Nancy Bennett, American Academy of Actuaries